You’ve probably heard about the new booster for Omicron. You’ve probably heard about it via tax payer (CARES and PREP acts) advertising. You may have even heard about it on your local news. And your local news may have attempted to debunk the “not tested on humans” narrative. Here’s what they’re not telling you:
MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENTS. Compare the vaccine commercials to regular prescription medication commercials (which make up about 70% of tv’s ad revenue). You probably noticed the absence of typical disclaimers. “Do not take if allergic to….” “This drug may cause…” and “Ask your doctor…” None of that is present with any of the covid product ads. This is because covid ads are paid for by the FDA. Manufacturers are not allowed to advertise emergency use (EUA) products at all. But the FDA can say whatever they want. And they can omit anything they want. They don’t have to say “consult your doctor if you’ve had a previous infection” or “do not take if allergic to PEG (polyethanlene glycol)” even though both are concerns for a good percentage of the population. In fact, the PEG allergy may be the cause of many of the 24 hour post shot deaths, a number well into the thousands.1
If you’re a healthy person taking a product against a mild illness, the least you deserve is FULL informed consent. Demand to know all the risks. Demand to know what side effects are cause for concern (like headaches or tremors) and which aren’t (none in my opinion).
UNTESTED. The new boosters were not tested on humans. The data presented to the FDA (which I have reviewed) was tested on eight mice. And since you can’t really tell if a mouse has covid, all they measured was antibody response. They decided if the mice produced antibodies similar to the original vaccine, it was fine to role out to the world.
“NOT ENOUGH TIME” LIE. The narrative for “mouse only” testing is that there was insufficient time for human clinical trials. So let’s look at the timeline. Omicron was actually detected in 2020 (not a typo). But they saw it taking off November 2021 and was dominate by December. So they’ve had 9-10 months to come up with an Omicron booster.
The original pandemic started in March 2020. And they had an entirely new vaccine ready for the world by December 2020. Yes, they were jumping off from a failed SARS 1 vaccine, but still, it was a new virus. Ten months for an entirely new vaccine with human trials. It just doesn’t make sense that they “didn’t have time” for Omicron trials.
They knew the virus was mutating my summer 2021 and should have been preparing for variant boosters. You were probably wondering in 2021 when an updated shot would come out, yes? Surely they were working on it, yes? Doesn’t it feel like they’re hiding something?
TWO IN ONE? Going back to the “antibody response in mice” data endpoint, they’re not being honest about it in my opinion. I listened to all eight hours of both vaccine committee discussions about Omicron boosters. During the first meeting, they spent most of the time discussing “vaccine equity,” an irrelevant race based analysis of who is taking shots It felt like they were just trying to fill up the time. A small percentage of the eight hour meeting was about whether to include the original shot mixed in with the Omicron booster, ie. “bivalent.” Or should they just use the Omicron part alone. The crazy thing was there was no data either way. The committee just said, “well the original shot was really good so yes, we should mix it in with the Omicron booster.” No data. No safety data. What are the implications of mixing two gene altering products in one? We have no idea. Now you get to be the mouse.
LACK OF EFFICACY. The second committee meeting was when they approved the Omicron booster and presented the mouse antibody data. What they fail to mention to the public is that all the available human data shows that these products only work for a few weeks. By sixteen weeks, almost all the data shows “negative efficacy” which means you’re more likely to get covid with the shot than without. There’s a minor boost for about a month before the efficacy falls off the cliff.
And that’s only if you don’t get covid immediately after your shot. There’s ample evidence of original antigenic sin, meaning the shot gives you the disease. But getting covid from the shot has always been a problem. It’s the reason why you weren’t “full vaccinated” for 2 weeks even though it only takes about 6 hours to produce antibodies. Two weeks was always a way to hide the most common side effect of the shot: getting covid. By only testing mice, they could avoid that whole issue.
So do the new boosters last longer? We have no idea. I believe the real reason they only tested eight mice for antibodies is either 1) they didn’t want to know if it would work and whether it would last, OR 2) they did test it, and the data was really really bad. They’re pretty good at massaging data to get a result they want (see my post about the abysmal young children’s data). But in the case of the bivalent boosters, I suspect they couldn’t make the numbers look good. Or just didn’t want to know. But they had the time to be sure. Stating otherwise is just a lie. (One of many.)
PREVAILING VARIANT ON THE WAY OUT. By the time you get your new and improved booster, there’s a good chance that the prevailing variant won’t be what’s in your shot. One of the shots has Omicron ba1 and the other has Omicron ba5. (I’m sorry I forgot which is which, but I’m sure your pharmacist will know.) But we’re already seeing Omicron ba4/ba5 being replaced by ba4.6 Now that doesn’t sound much different - ba5 vs ba4.6. But it is. The genetic mutations of ba4.6 are as different as Delta is from the original Wuhan strain. The whole reason why we don’t vaccinate for corona viruses is because they mutate so quickly. It’s never worked before. It’s not working now. And they know it but they can’t stop the freight train of money and power associated with these shots.
Buyer beware.
Aaron Rodgers has a PEG allergy which is why he could not take the shot. It was never political despite how the media has framed it.